Corporate L&D
Compliance training, and a certificate anyone can verify
For an L&D team the question is rarely whether people can watch a video. It is whether you can prove, two years later, who completed what and when.
Judged on: Audit, and completion evidence
What you would actually use
In your order, using your words — learner, compliance, renewal, audit.
Certificates with public verification
Issued from a template, revocable, checkable by anyone holding the code with no account.
An audit trail that is a hash chain
Every mutation with a field-level diff, chained to the entry before it. Erasure tombstones the record rather than rewriting the chain that proves it.
Roles that match an org chart
Scoped to a department or a single record, with per-user overrides and delegation for when somebody is away.
Reporting and exports
Dashboards, saved report definitions, and exports collected in one place.
Assessments with item analysis
Not just a pass mark — which question was ambiguous, and which separated the people who knew it from the people who did not.
Your branding, your domain
One build serves every tenant; branding is injected into the server-rendered shell rather than compiled.
When we are the wrong choice
There is no SAML, OIDC or SCIM yet. If your requirement is that people sign in with your corporate identity provider and are provisioned automatically, that is not built — Google, Microsoft and GitHub sign-in is.
Start on the free tier. Bring your spreadsheet.
A hundred seats, twenty-five courses and no conversation. If you would rather see it driven by someone who knows it, that takes twenty minutes.
Or open the sandbox (opens in a new tab) and click around first. No form.